<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://papahou.arphahub.com/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="rapid-communication" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">134</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:99e0d2cb-a972-51c9-87f9-cbb71166eebd</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Papahou: Records of the Auckland Museum</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">Papahou</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">3021-3576</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Auckland Museum Trust Board</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">176367</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Short Communication</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Natural Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>Australasia</subject>
          <subject>New Zealand</subject>
          <subject>Pacific Ocean</subject>
          <subject>Polynesia</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Rangitāhua soil chemistry: A technical report on the chemical properties of Rangitāhua soils</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Morman</surname>
            <given-names>Kendall</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">kendall.morman@auckland.ac.nz</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6460-0441</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Beggs</surname>
            <given-names>Jacqueline</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2112-2803</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bellingham</surname>
            <given-names>Peter</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9646-4819</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Lear</surname>
            <given-names>Gavin</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5083-4773</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand</addr-line>
        <institution>University of Auckland</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Auckland</addr-line>
        <country>New Zealand</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/03b94tp07</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Te Ara Whānui Research Centre, Te Paki, New Zealand</addr-line>
        <institution>Bioeconomy Science Institute, Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Christchurch</addr-line>
        <country>New Zealand</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/03b94tp07</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Bioeconomy Science Institute, Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Christchurch, New Zealand</addr-line>
        <institution>Te Ara Whānui Research Centre</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Te Paki</addr-line>
        <country>New Zealand</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Kendall Morman (<email xlink:type="simple">kendall.morman@auckland.ac.nz</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: Dan Blanchon</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>09</day>
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>60</volume>
      <fpage>17</fpage>
      <lpage>24</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/33E707E5-0784-5141-B414-6368CA208B4F">33E707E5-0784-5141-B414-6368CA208B4F</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>03</day>
          <month>11</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>16</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Kendall Morman, Jacqueline Beggs, Peter Bellingham, Gavin Lear</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>This report characterises the soil chemistry beneath kahika trees (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Metrosideros">Metrosideros</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="kermadecensis">kermadecensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) on two remote, subtropical oceanic islands in the South Pacific, Rangitāhua, which currently has a lower abundance of seabirds but supported dense populations until the 20<sup>th</sup> century, and North Meyer Island, which supports a dense seabird population. Soil was collected from five locations on both islands in November 2023. Soil Chemistry testing was conducted by Maanaki Whenua Environmental Laboratory, and, for Rangitāhua samples, further testing was carried out by Hills Laboratory.</p>
        <p><bold>Key results</bold>:</p>
        <p>* Soil pH was 6.16 ± 0.22 (mean ± SE) on Rangitāhua and 4.12 ± 0.25 on North Meyer Island.</p>
        <p>* Soil organic carbon was 10.36% ± 1.09 on Rangitāhua and 11.39% ± 3.51 on North Meyer Island.</p>
        <p>* Total soil nitrogen was 0.58% ± 0.039 on Rangitāhua and 0.77% ± 0.226 on North Meyer Island.</p>
        <p>* Soil <abbrev xlink:title="carbon to nitrogen ratio">C:N</abbrev> ratios were 17.74 ± 0.93 on Rangitāhua and 14.16 ± 0.72 on North Meyer Island.</p>
        <p>* Total phosphorus was 856.8 mg/kg ± 81.53 on Rangitāhua and 3462.8 mg/kg ± 908.74 on North Meyer Is.</p>
        <p>Soil nutrient concentrations offer critical insights into soil fertility, forest health and the functioning of soil microbial communities. The differences observed between the two islands may reflect variations in seabird abundance and disturbance history (including invasive mammals) and can inform future ecosystem management and conservation strategies. These results suggest that seabird presence is linked with lower pH and elevated phosphorus on North Meyer. Meanwhile, carbon and nitrogen values remain within a comparable range across both islands.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>Island Ecosystems</kwd>
        <kwd>Rangitāhua</kwd>
        <kwd>Seabirds</kwd>
        <kwd>Soil Chemistry</kwd>
        <kwd>Subtropical Islands</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement>Te Mana o Rangitāhua</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Background" id="sec1">
      <title>Background</title>
      <p>Soil chemistry is influenced by natural processes such as weathering of bedrock, atmospheric deposition, and biological inputs. On islands with seabird populations, nutrient enrichment from guano significantly alters soil properties – typically, increasing levels of nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations while reducing soil pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Mulder and Keall 2001</xref>). These changes in soil chemistry can affect the entire terrestrial ecosystem, including microbial communities that drive nutrient cycling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Colwell 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Astudillo-García et al. 2019</xref>). Understanding these chemical dynamics is essential for assessing ecosystem health, nutrient cycling, and potential impacts on native vegetation.</p>
      <p>Commonly reported soil indicators include pH, carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus.</p>
      <list list-type="bullet">
        <list-item>
          <p><bold>Soil pH</bold> indicates the level of acidity and alkalinity of soil, which alters the availability of soil nutrients to plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Sparling et al. 2008</xref>). Most plants and soil organisms have an optimum pH range where they grow best. In mainland New Zealand’s native forests, most soils are acidic, with a pH ranging from 5–7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ballinger and Macdonald 2020</xref>).
                </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p><bold>Soil carbon</bold> includes both inorganic and organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Sparling et al. 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hamilton and Anderson 2022</xref>). Soil carbon enhances soil structure, promotes aggregation to protect against physical degradation, supplies nutrients through mineralisation, supports microbial activity, improves water storage, and aids nutrient cycling; all of which contribute to better plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Shepherd et al. 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Sparling et al. 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hamilton and Anderson 2022</xref>).
                </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p><bold>Nitrogen</bold> is essential for plant growth and a key limiting nutrient in most ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Sparling et al. 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">United State Department of Agriculture 2014</xref>). It is mostly found in organic forms and needs to be mineralised into inorganic forms (ammonium and nitrate) before it can be used by plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cabello et al. 2009</xref>).
                </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p><bold>The carbon to nitrogen ratio (<abbrev xlink:title="carbon to nitrogen ratio">C:N</abbrev>)</bold> typically gives an indication of the decomposition of organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">McLaren and Cameron 1990</xref>). A lower ratio indicates more readily available nitrogen in the soil, while a higher ratio indicates a larger source of slow-decomposing organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cabello et al. 2009</xref>). In New Zealand’s native forests, ratios of 15–17 are considered adequate for supporting plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Sparling et al. 2008</xref>).
                </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p><bold>Phosphorus</bold> is another essential nutrient that is found in many different forms in the soil, with phosphate the form that is biologically available to most plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Sparling et al. 2008</xref>). Total phosphorus includes all forms, both available and unavailable. Native forest soils in New Zealand tend to have low P concentrations, with most native plant species well adapted to these nutrient-poor conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Sparling et al. 2008</xref>). In contrast, plants typically used in horticulture and pasture require higher soil phosphorus concentrations, and these requirements are often met through the addition of phosphorus in fertilisers.
                </p>
        </list-item>
      </list>
      <p>This report examines how soil nutrient concentrations are related to seabird abundance and historical disturbance on two neighbouring two islands, Rangitāhua and North Meyer Island, to better understand their role in ecosystem processes and to inform future conservation management.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="methods" id="sec2">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Study location" id="sec3">
        <title>Study location</title>
        <p>This study compares soils from Rangitāhua (<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29°15'S, 177°55'W</named-content>) and nearby North Meyer Island. They are located approximately 1,000 km north of Aotearoa, New Zealand and a similar distance south of Tonga. Rangitāhua is a remote, volcanically active island of immense cultural significance to many Māori as a traditional stopping point in ancestral Polynesian migrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Brown 2024</xref>). It lies within the rohe of Ngāti Kuri.</p>
        <p>The soils of Rangitāhua are composed from a mixture of basalt, andesitic ash, and pumice. They are generally young and relatively fertile, shaped by recent volcanic activity and ongoing erosion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Wright and Metson 1959</xref>). The terrain of the island is steep, with the highest peak, Moumoukai, reaching 516 m above sea level, and is dominated by mature Kahika (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Metrosideros">Metrosideros</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="kermadecensis">kermadecensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) forest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Towns 2023</xref>). However, its ecosystem has been historically impacted by mammalian pests such as goats, rats, and cats, and transformer weed species, introduced by European settlers in the 1900’s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cieraad 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gentry 2013</xref>). Since the eradication of mammalian pests, completed by 2003, and conservation efforts to remove transformer weeds, Rangitāhua’s ecosystem has recovered substantially (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cieraad 2006</xref>). However, seabird breeding populations have yet to return to their pre-disturbance levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gaskin 2011</xref>).</p>
        <p>In contrast, North Meyer Island (130 m asl.), is a remnant of older volcanic activity in the region and has remained pest-free, serving as a refuge for seabirds and other terrestrial birds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Lloyd and Nathan 1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Veitch et al. 2004</xref>). The soils are developed on weathered andesitic tuff that has been strongly modified by nesting seabird species. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Oliver 1910</xref>). North Meyer is predominantly a seabird colony (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Towns 2023</xref>), supporting 13 seabird species, including surface-nesting and burrowing types (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gaskin 2011</xref>). The topography is steep, and the dominant tree is Ngaio <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Myoporum">Myoporum</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="rapense">rapense</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, with a number of kahika trees at higher elevations.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Soil collection" id="sec4">
        <title>Soil collection</title>
        <p>Sampling was carried out beneath kahika (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Metrosideros">Metrosideros</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="kermadecensis">kermadecensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) which is the dominant canopy tree species on Rangitāhua. To ensure consistency in overlying vegetation structure across sites on both islands, all soil samples were collected from beneath kahika trees (see Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367.figure1</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">B3E25D92-06E6-584E-A42B-022EDFABE409</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Flowering Kahika forest on Rangitāhua. K Morman 2023. All rights reserved.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="papahou-60-017_article-176367__-g001.jpg" id="oo_1587477.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1587477</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Soils were collected beneath kahika trees within five permanent plots in forests (30 × 30 m) on Rangitāhua and from beneath 10 kahika trees at a single location on North Meyer Island (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). The Rangitāhua plots were established in 1993 to track the impact of rat eradication on vegetation on the island, and the canopy is dominated by kahika (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cieraad 2006</xref>). All five plots have been dominated since their establishment by a mature kahika canopy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cieraad 2006</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367.figure2</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">64DA6E09-3459-5537-9C0E-5E4DCF724EBA</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Map of Rangitāhua and Meyer Islands. Yellow circles indicate where soil was collected in November 2023 from five locations on Rangitāhua and one on neighbouring North Meyer Island. Created using R version 4.4.1 using data from OpenStreetMap.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="papahou-60-017_article-176367__-g002.jpg" id="oo_1587478.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1587478</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Soil samples were collected between 10–19 November 2023 using a 25 mm diameter soil auger to a depth of 10 cm. At each Rangitāhua plot, soil from 15 trees was combined into a single pooled sample for analysis. On North Meyer, samples were pooled from beneath 10 trees (see Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table SS2), and five of these were analysed individually (see Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table SS1).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Seabird abundance" id="sec5">
        <title>Seabird abundance</title>
        <p>On North Meyer, nesting Kermadec petrels (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pterodroma">Pterodroma</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="neglecta">neglecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) and masked boobies (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Sula">Sula</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dactylatra">dactylatra</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) were observed near the sampled kahika trees. Burrowing wedge-tail shearwaters (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ardenna">Ardenna</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pacifica">pacifica</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) were also present. Seabird burrows and nesting birds were ubiquitous and difficult to avoid while sampling. In contrast, no seabird burrows or signs of recent nesting were observed at any of the Rangitāhua sites, and burrow density was not quantified. However, seabird burrows have been reported elsewhere on Rangitāhua, though at a lower density (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gaskin 2011</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Soil chemistry" id="sec6">
        <title>Soil chemistry</title>
        <p>The soil nutrient concentrations of the Rangitāhua samples and the North Meyer samples were analysed by the Manaaki Whenua Environmental Chemistry Laboratory in Palmerston North. Rangitāhua soils were analysed as composite samples only. For North Meyer, ten samples were collected in total. Five were analysed individually, and an additional composite sample was prepared by combining equal amounts of soil from all ten samples and analysed separately (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>.). All analyses were performed on air-dried soils.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Location, date and collection details of soil samples collected from Rangitāhua and North Meyer Island. CC BY 4.0.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Island</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Sample location</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Sample type</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Altitude (m)</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>GPS locations</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">10/03/2023</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Rangitāhua</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Terraces</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Composite</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">60</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner A: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24567°S, 177.92955°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner B: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24588°S, 177.92964°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner C: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24587°S, 177.92989°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner D: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24559°S, 177.92981°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">11/03/2023</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Rangitāhua</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Rayner Point</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Composite</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">140</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner A: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25426°S, 177.90405°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner B: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25400°S, 177.90395°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner C: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25403°S, 177.90369°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner D: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25435°S, 177.90381°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">12/03/2023</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Rangitāhua</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Denham Bay track</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Composite</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">189</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner A: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25102°S, 177.92778°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner B: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25127°S, 177.92786°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner C: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25120°S, 177.92812°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner D: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25095°S, 177.92807°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">13/03/2023</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Rangitāhua</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Low Flat</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Composite</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner A: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24826°S, 177.92274°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner B:<named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24849°S,177.92287°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner C: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24841°S, 177.92320°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner D: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24817°S, 177.92308°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">14/03/2023</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Rangitāhua</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Pukekohu</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Composite</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">450</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner A: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25360°S, 177.94301°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner B: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25341°S, 177.94299°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner C: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25346°S, 177.94269°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Corner D: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.25360°S, 177.94301°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="10" colspan="1">19/03/2023</td>
                <td rowspan="10" colspan="1">North Meyer</td>
                <td rowspan="10" colspan="1">Mey</td>
                <td rowspan="10" colspan="1">Composite</td>
                <td rowspan="10" colspan="1">72–130</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 1: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24493°S, 177.87753°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 2: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24493°S, 177.87701°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 3: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24467°S, 177.87622°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 4: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24479°S, 177.87628°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 5: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24479°S, 177.87621°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 6: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24468°S, 177.87613°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 7: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24466°S, 177.87604°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 8: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24467°S, 177.87611°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 9: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24463°S, 177.87614°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 10: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24471°S, 177.87619°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19/03/2023</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">North Meyer</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mey 1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Individual</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">72</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 1: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24493°S, 177.87753°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19/03/2023</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">North Meyer</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mey 2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Individual</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">95</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 2: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24493°S, 177.87701°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19/03/2023</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">North Meyer</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mey 4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Individual</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">130</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 4: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24479°S, 177.87628°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19/03/2023</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">North Meyer</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mey 5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Individual</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">128</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 5: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24479°S, 177.87621°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19/03/2023</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">North Meyer</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mey 6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Individual</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">128</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tree 6: <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates">29.24468°S, 177.87613°W</named-content></td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Each soil sample was air-dried at 35 °C and then ground and sieved to &lt;2 mm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Metson 1971</xref>). Soil pH was measured in a 1:2.5 soil-to-water suspension after an overnight equilibration using a pH electrode (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Blakemore et al. 1987</xref>). Organic carbon and total nitrogen were measured using a CN98 analyser, which uses the Dumas principle of dry combustion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Leco Corporation 2003</xref>). Samples were combusted in pure oxygen at 1050 °C. An aliquot was subsampled and passed through a heated copper catalyst, which measures forms of nitrogen (N<sub>2</sub>) and organic carbon (CO<sub>2</sub>), and was measured using an infrared detector cell. <abbrev xlink:title="carbon to nitrogen ratio">C:N</abbrev> was calculated based on the ratio of nitrogen to organic carbon. Total phosphorus was determined by igniting the soil at 550 °C for 60 minutes, extracting the residue with 0.5 M sulphuric acid for 16 hours, and analysing the extract using a flow injection analyser (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Blakemore et al. 1987</xref>).</p>
        <p>Additional soil testing was conducted on the composite samples at RJ Hill Laboratories (Hamilton) using their General Soil and Organic Soil profiles. These samples were also air-dried at 35–40°C overnight (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hill Laboratories 2025b</xref>). Soil pH was determined using a 1:2 (v/v) soil to water slurry, followed by potentiometric measurement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hill Laboratories 2025b</xref>). Soil total carbon and total nitrogen were determined using the Dumas dry combustion analyser (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Hill Laboratories 2025a</xref>). <abbrev xlink:title="carbon to nitrogen ratio">C:N</abbrev> was calculated based on the ratio of total carbon to total nitrogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hill Laboratories 2025c</xref>). Olsen phosphorus was measured using a 0.5 M sodium bicarbonate (pH 8.5) extraction, followed by molybdenum blue colorimetry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hill Laboratories 2025b</xref>). Total phosphorus was determined by heating soil at 550 °C for 60 minutes, extracting with 0.5 M sulphuric acid for 16 hours and analysing with a flow injection analyser (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Blakemore et al. 1987</xref>).</p>
        <p>Concentrations of the cations calcium (<abbrev xlink:title="calcium">Ca</abbrev>), potassium (K), magnesium (<abbrev xlink:title="magnesium">Mg</abbrev>), and sodium (<abbrev xlink:title="sodium">Na</abbrev>) were measured in 1 M neutral ammonium acetate extracts using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (<abbrev xlink:title="inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry">ICP-OES</abbrev>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hill Laboratories 2025b</xref>). Cation Exchange Capacity (<abbrev xlink:title="Cation Exchange Capacity">CEC</abbrev>) was calculated as the sum of these four cations and reported in me/100 g (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Blakemore et al. 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hill Laboratories 2025b</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Statistical tests" id="sec7">
        <title>Statistical tests</title>
        <p>Mean values and standard errors were calculated from the soils tested by Manaaki Whenua. Welch’s t-tests were then used to assess whether pH, total carbon, total nitrogen, <abbrev xlink:title="carbon to nitrogen ratio">C:N</abbrev> ratio, and total phosphorus differed significantly between Rangitāhua and North Meyer. All statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.4.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">R Core Team 2024</xref>). Data and R script related to the statistical analyses can be found in Suppl. materials <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S2">2</xref>–4.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec8">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>This report focuses on interpreting five key soil chemistry results: pH, total carbon, total nitrogen, <abbrev xlink:title="carbon to nitrogen ratio">C:N</abbrev> ratio, and total phosphorus. Full data are provided in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: tables S1, S2.</p>
      <sec sec-type="Soil pH" id="sec9">
        <title>Soil pH</title>
        <p>All soils on Rangitāhua were mildly acidic, with a mean pH of 6.16 ± 0.22 (SE). In contrast, soils on North Meyer had a lower mean pH of 4.12 ± 0.25 (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). A Welch’s t-test showed that pH was significantly lower on North Meyer than on Rangitāhua (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367.figure3</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">E9421602-390A-57C6-899A-2D454AAED9C6</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Mean soil pH in soils from Rangitāhua and North Meyer Island collected in November 2023. Error bars show standard error. Number of samples per location = 5. CC BY 4.0.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="papahou-60-017_article-176367__-g003.jpg" id="oo_1587479.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1587479</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Mean (± SE) and Welch’s t-test results for soil chemistry properties across Rangitāhua and North Meyer Islands n = 5. Values are means ± SE. CI = 95% confidence interval (North Meyer – Rangitāhua). Negative CI values reflect higher means in Rangitāhua. CC BY 4.0.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Variable</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="2">
                  <bold>Mean and standard error</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Welch’s t</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <bold>P value</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <bold>CI low</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <bold>CI high</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>North Meyer</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Rangitāhua</bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">pH</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.12 ± 0.25</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.16 ± 0.22</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-6.09 (7.92)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.000304</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-2.81</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-1.27</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Organic Carbon %</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11.39 ± 3.51</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">10.36 ± 1.09</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.28 (4.77)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.791</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-8.55</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">10.61</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total Nitrogen %</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.77 ± 0.23</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.58 ± 0.04</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.84 (4.23)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.443</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-0.43</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.82</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">CN ratio</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">14.16 ± 0.72</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">17.75 ± 0.94</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-3.04 (7.53)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0174</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-6.35</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">-0.83</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total Phosphorus (mg/kg)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3462.80 ± 908.75</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">856.80 ± 81.53</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.86 (4.06)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0452</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">88.53</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5123.47</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Organic carbon" id="sec10">
        <title>Organic carbon</title>
        <p>Rangitāhua sites had a mean organic soil carbon level 10.36% ± 1.09 and North Meyer soils a mean of 11.39 ± 3.51 (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). A Welch’s t-test indicated that soil carbon levels were not significantly different at both locations (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). CC BY 4.0.</p>
        <fig id="F4">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367.figure4</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">80C2BABC-BB04-5734-84D8-744664973415</object-id>
          <label>Figure 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Mean soil organic carbon (%) in soils from Rangitāhua and North Meyer Island collected in November 2023. Error bars show standard error. Number of samples per location = 5.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="papahou-60-017_article-176367__-g004.jpg" id="oo_1587480.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1587480</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Total nitrogen" id="sec11">
        <title>Total nitrogen</title>
        <p>The mean total soil nitrogen was 0.58% ± 0.04 on Rangitāhua and 0.77% ± 0.23 on North Meyer (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). A Welch’s t-test indicated that total nitrogen levels did not differ significantly between the two sites (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F5">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367.figure5</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">88A867DE-56A6-589E-AFFC-F315DEF86320</object-id>
          <label>Figure 5.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Mean total nitrogen in soils from Rangitāhua and North Meyer Island collected in November 2023. Error bars show standard error. Number of samples per location = 5. CC BY 4.0.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="papahou-60-017_article-176367__-g005.jpg" id="oo_1587481.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1587481</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Carbon: Nitrogen" id="sec12">
        <title>Carbon: Nitrogen</title>
        <p>The mean <abbrev xlink:title="carbon to nitrogen ratio">C:N</abbrev> ratio was 17.75 ± 0.94 for Rangitāhua soils and 14.16 ± 0.72 for North Meyer soils (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). A Welch’s t-test indicated that North Meyer had a significantly lower <abbrev xlink:title="carbon to nitrogen ratio">C:N</abbrev> ratio than Rangitāhua (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F6">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367.figure6</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">0854AA73-D9CA-523A-A497-2EB3540B78DC</object-id>
          <label>Figure 6.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Mean carbon: nitrogen ratio in soils from Rangitāhua and North Meyer Island collected in November 2023. Error bars show standard error. Number of samples per location = 5. CC BY 4.0.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="papahou-60-017_article-176367__-g006.jpg" id="oo_1587482.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1587482</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <fig id="F7">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367.figure7</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">65754BFC-2DCD-56DA-BEAF-2ACC4EFA0DD5</object-id>
          <label>Figure 7.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Mean phosphorus (mg/kg) in soils from Rangitāhua and North Meyer Island collected in November 2023. Error bars show standard error. Number of samples per location = 5. CC BY 4.0.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="papahou-60-017_article-176367__-g007.jpg" id="oo_1587483.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1587483</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Total phosphorus" id="sec13">
        <title>Total phosphorus</title>
        <p>The mean total phosphorus was 856.80 ± 81.53 mg/kg on Rangitāhua and 3462.80 ± 908.75 mg/kg on North Meyer (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). A Welch’s t-test indicated that total phosphorus was significantly higher on North Meyer than on Rangitāhua (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec14">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Our results are consistent with ecological expectations based on seabird presence and island histories. Soils of North Meyer Island, characterised by dense seabird colonies, were markedly more acidic, had reduced <abbrev xlink:title="carbon to nitrogen ratio">C:N</abbrev> and enriched total phosphorus compared to Rangitāhua soils. This reflects the strong influence of seabird nutrient inputs on soil chemistry. These findings are consistent with a large body of literature showing that seabird activity has a significant impact on soil dynamics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Markwell 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Mulder and Keall 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fukami et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Durrett et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Orwin et al. 2016</xref>). The observed statistical lower pH and more acidic soils on North Meyer are likely a result of the high numbers of seabirds contributing guano, which is known to acidify soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Mulder and Keall 2001</xref>). Guano also contributes to high soil phosphorus levels which we also observed in this study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Mulder and Keall 2001</xref>).</p>
      <p>Previous work on Rangitāhua soils was undertaken in 1959 by Wright and Metson, who conducted extensive sampling across the island. Soils were categorised, described, and mapped, and chemical analyses were also carried out (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Wright and Metson 1959</xref>). When compared with our 2023 results, there are significant differences in soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, but little change in pH or <abbrev xlink:title="carbon to nitrogen ratio">C:N</abbrev> ratios (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: tables S3, S4). These discrepancies may reflect differences in testing methodologies, the approximate nature of site locations, and the long-time span between measurements. However, it is notable that the 1959 study predates the eradication of rats and goats from Rangitāhua. Mammalian pests are known to have major impacts on soil nutrient levels by reducing nesting seabird populations, consuming seeds, and removing vegetation all of which alter nutrient cycling in soils.</p>
      <p>Despite the absence of historic soil chemistry data for North Meyer Island, its ecological history differs significantly from Rangitāhua due to the absence of mammalian pests contributing to status as major site of seabird nesting. In contrast, Rangitāhua’s soils appear typical of a recovering island forest, with most nutrient levels higher than in 1959 but still lower overall compared to North Meyer. North Meyer’s soils reflect a contrasting trajectory driven by persistent seabird activity.</p>
      <p>It should also be highlighted that though Rangitāhua and North Meyer are oceanic islands in close proximity; they have major geological differences in size, volcanic history and human disturbance histories that also shape soil chemistry. These findings highlight how seabird activity, invasive mammals, and differing disturbance histories may contribute to shaping soil nutrient dynamics on Rangitāhua and North Meyer, offering important insights into soil dynamic of island ecosystems. These results contribute to our understanding of nutrient cycling on Rangitāhua, informing future conservation and restoration planning on Rangitāhua and across other offshore islands.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Artificial Intelligence (AI) use" id="sec15">
      <title>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</title>
      <p>Regarding the use of AI in the preparation of this manuscript, the authors declare the following:</p>
      <p><bold>Description</bold>: Artificial intelligence platforms, including OpenAI and Google Gemini, were used to assist with coding and graph generation in R.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>Ngā mihi nui to the wider Te Mana o Rangitāhua whānau who supported this project. The research was funded by the MBIE Endeavour programme (AWMMU2001), the University of Auckland and Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Astudillo-García C, Hermans SM, Stevenson B, Buckley HL, Lear G (2019) Microbial assemblages and bioindicators as proxies for ecosystem health status: potential and limitations. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 103: 6407–6421. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00253-019-09963-0" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09963-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Ballinger J, Macdonald A (2020) Soil quality in Northland. Northland Regional Council, 33 pp. [Available from] <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.nrc.govt.nz/media/qyrlupey/nrc-soil-monitoring-report-2016-17.pdf">www.nrc.govt.nz/media/qyrlupey/nrc-soil-monitoring-report-2016-17.pdf</ext-link> [date of access 02/May/2025]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Blakemore LC, Searle PL, Daly BK (1987) Methods for chemical analysis of soils. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, 103 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Brown IK (2024) Many visitors, many names: A history of human interaction with Rangitāhua, the Kermadec Islands. Masters Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Cabello P, Roldán MD, Castillo F, Moreno-Vivián C (2009) Nitrogen Cycle. In: Schaechter M (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Microbiology (Third Edition). Academic Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 299–321. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/B978-012373944-5.00055-9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373944-5.00055-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Cieraad E (2006) Vegetation response to the rat eradication on Raoul Island, New Zealand. Report prepared for the Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand, 45 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Colwell RR (1997) Microbial diversity: the importance of exploration and conservation. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 18: 302–307. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/sj.jim.2900390" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.2900390</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Durrett MS, Wardle DA, Mulder CPH, Barry RP (2014) Seabirds as agents of spatial heterogeneity on New Zealand’s offshore islands. Plant and Soil 383: 139–153. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s11104-014-2172-z" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2172-z</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Fukami T, Wardle DA, Bellingham PJ, Mulder CP, Towns DR, Yeates GW, Bonner KI, Durrett MS, Grant‐Hoffman MN, Williamson WM (2006) Above‐and below‐ground impacts of introduced predators in seabird‐dominated island ecosystems. Ecology Letters 9: 1299–1307. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00983.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00983.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Gaskin CP (2011) Seabirds of the Kermadec region: Their natural history and conservation. Science for Conservation 316. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand, 71 pp. [Available from] <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.doc.govt.nz/documents/science-and-technical/sfc316.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.doc.govt.nz/documents/science-and-technical/sfc316.pdf</ext-link> [date of access 02/May/2025]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Gentry S (2013) Raoul &amp; the Kermadecs: New Zealand’s Northernmost Islands: A history. Steele Roberts Aotearoa, Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand, 346 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Hamilton L, Anderson G (2022) Soil Carbon Snapshot. Agriculture Victoria, Melbourne, Australia, 36 pp. [Available from] <ext-link xlink:href="https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/climate-and-weather/understanding-carbon-and-emissions/soils-and-carbon-for-reduced-emissions#:~:text=Soil%20carbon%20provides%20a%20source,and%20protects%20soil%20from%20erosion" ext-link-type="uri">https://agriculture.vic.gov.au/climate-and-weather/understanding-carbon-and-emissions/soils-and-carbon-for-reduced-emissions#:~:text=Soil%20carbon%20provides%20a%20source,and%20protects%20soil%20from%20erosion</ext-link> [date of access 02/May/2025]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Hill Laboratories (2025a) [undated] Services offered: Soil nitrogen tests. RJ Hill Laboratories Limited, Hamiliton, New Zealand, 2 pp. [Available from] <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.hill-labs.co.nz/media/3zcji4lr/14666v9_services-offered-soil-nitrogen-tests.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.hill-labs.co.nz/media/3zcji4lr/14666v9_services-offered-soil-nitrogen-tests.pdf</ext-link> [date of access 02/May/2025]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Hill Laboratories (2025b) [undated] Technical note: Assessing soil quality the organic soil profile. RJ Hill Laboratories Limited, Hamiliton, New Zealand, 4 pp. [Available from] <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.hill-labs.co.nz/media/bgopdesz/10151_technical-note-assessing-soil-quality-the-organic-soil-profile.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.hill-labs.co.nz/media/bgopdesz/10151_technical-note-assessing-soil-quality-the-organic-soil-profile.pdf</ext-link> [date of access 02/May/2025]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Hill Laboratories (2025c) [undated] Technical note: Soil tests and interpretation. RJ Hill Laboratories Limited, Hamiliton, New Zealand, 12 pp. [Available from] <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.hill-labs.co.nz/media/djdbzzhl/3196_technical-note-soil-tests-and-interpretation.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.hill-labs.co.nz/media/djdbzzhl/3196_technical-note-soil-tests-and-interpretation.pdf</ext-link> [date of access 02/May/2025]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Leco Corporation (2003) Total/organic carbon and nitrogen in soils. St. Joseph, MI, United States, MO, Organic Application Note 203-821-165.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Lloyd EF, Nathan S (1981) Geology and tephrochronology of Raoul Island, Kermadec Group, New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Bulletin. 95, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, New Zealand, 105 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Markwell TJ (1999) Keystone species on New Zeeland offshore islands: Ecological relationships of seabirds, rats, reptiles and invertebrates on Cook Strait islands. PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. <ext-link xlink:href="10.26686/wgtn.16945393" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.16945393</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>McLaren RG, Cameron DKC (1990) Soil science: an introduction to the properties and management of New Zealand soils. Oxford University Press, Auckland, New Zealand, 294 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Metson A (1971) Methods of chemical analysis for soil survey samples. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, New Zealand, 207 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Mulder CP, Keall SN (2001) Burrowing seabirds and reptiles: impacts on seeds, seedlings and soils in an island forest in New Zealand. Oecologia 127: 350–360. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s004420000600" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000600</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Oliver WRB (1910) Art. XLVI – The geology of the Kermadec Islands. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand 43: 524–535.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Orwin KH, Wardle DA, Towns DR, St. John MG, Bellingham PJ, Jones C, Fitzgerald BM, Parrish RG, Lyver PO (2016) Burrowing seabird effects on invertebrate communities in soil and litter are dominated by ecosystem engineering rather than nutrient addition. Oecologia 180: 217–230. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00442-015-3437-9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3437-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>R Core Team (2024) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <ext-link xlink:href="10.32614/r.manuals" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.32614/r.manuals</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Shepherd T, Saggar S, Newman R, Ross C, Dando J (2001) Tillage-induced changes to soil structure and organic carbon fractions in New Zealand soils. Soil Research 39: 465–489. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1071/sr00018" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1071/sr00018</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Sparling G, Lilburne L, Vojvodic-Vukovic M (2008) Provisional targets for soil quality indicators in New Zealand. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand, 64 pp. [Available from] <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.mwpress.co.nz/soil/provisional-targets-for-soil-quality-indicators-in-new-zealand" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.mwpress.co.nz/soil/provisional-targets-for-soil-quality-indicators-in-new-zealand</ext-link> [date of access 02/May/2025]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Towns DR (2023) Ahuahu: a conservation journey in Aotearoa New Zealand. Canterbury University Press, Christchurch, New Zealand, 384 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>United State Department of Agriculture (2014) Soil Nitrogen: Soil Health Educators Guide, United State Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, United States, 10 pp. [Available from] <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-10/Soil%20Nitrogen.pdf" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-10/Soil%20Nitrogen.pdf</ext-link> [date of access 02/May/2025]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Veitch CR, Miskelly CM, Harper GA, Taylor GA, Tennyson AJ (2004) Birds of the Kermadec Islands, south-west Pacific. Notornis 51(2): 61–90. <ext-link xlink:href="10.63172/239332vjutmu" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.63172/239332vjutmu</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Wright ACS, Metson AJ (1959) No 10. Soils of Raoul (Sunday) Island, Kermadec Group. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, New Zealand. <ext-link xlink:href="10.7931/dl1-sbb-010" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.7931/dl1-sbb-010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">E727D5D8-5E75-5BE1-B5A4-A1AFBEC2CD48</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Full soil chemistry results from Rangitāhua and North Meyer</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>docx</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p>This document provides a comprehensive list of soil chemistry tests conducted on samples from Rangitāhua and North Meyer Island, conducted by Manaaki Whenua Environmental Chemistry Laboratory and RJ Hills Laboratory. It also contains an analysis of the key results from this report and historical soil chemistry data published by Wright and Metson in 1969.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="papahou-60-017_article-176367__-s001.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1587484.docx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1587484</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Kendall Morman</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S2" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367.suppl2</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">68E06FD1-C614-5900-BB46-8D2897AA9DCD</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 2</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Rangitahua soil technical report data analysis</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>xlsx</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p>This spreadsheet contains soil chemistry results and the statistical values calculated to compare soils from Rangitāhua with those from North Meyer Island, as well as to compare current Rangitāhua soils with historical data collected by Wright and Metson in 1969. All analyses were conducted using RStudio.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="papahou-60-017_article-176367__-s002.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1587485.xlsx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1587485</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Kendall Morman</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S3" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367.suppl3</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">0C163226-D6BD-5D9F-94A6-6E95D8A55DBD</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 3</label>
        <caption>
          <p>R script for statistical analysis of soil chemistry comparing Rangitāhua and North Meyer Island</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>R</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p>R script for statistical analysis of soil chemistry comparing Rangitāhua and North Meyer Island.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="papahou-60-017_article-176367__-s003.r" mimetype="text" mime-subtype="plain" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1587486.R">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1587486</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Kendall Morman</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S4" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.32912/papahou.60.176367.suppl4</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">687270D4-A118-50D8-86CF-57344DF75F5C</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 4</label>
        <caption>
          <p>R script for statistical analysis of soil chemistry comparing 2023 Rangitāhua soils to 1969 soil</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>R</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p>R script for statistical analysis of soil chemistry comparing 2023 Rangitāhua soils to 1969 soil. Historic soil data was published by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Wright and Metson 1969</xref>.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="papahou-60-017_article-176367__-s004.r" mimetype="text" mime-subtype="plain" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1587487.R">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1587487</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Kendall Morman</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
